Birds and Birding Avian Productivity and Survivorship
Monitoring Avian Productivity and Survivorship At the Macphail Woods Ecological Forestry Project
2006 Field Season Progress Report
Submitted to: Macphail Woods Ecological Forestry Project, PEI Model Forest Network Partnership, Holland College's Wildlife Conservation Technology
Submitted by: Dwaine Oakley
April 2, 2007
red-breasted nuthatch.
purple finch.
ruffed grouse track.
I would first like to gratefully acknowledge the financial support of the PEI Model Forest Network Partnership Ltd. to this valuable environmental project. Next without the continued support of the staff of the Macphail Woods Ecological Forestry Project the MAPS station in Orwell would probably not exist. So I would like to extend a special thanks to Gary Schneider, Jennifer Roma and Eric Edwards who volunteered their time either to help extract and band birds that were caught in the mist nets or to bring school children out to the banding site so they could get firsthand experience of the natural world close-up. Lastly I would like to thank Ben Hoteling and those students of Holland College's Wildlife Conservation Technology Program (WCT) who helped in the setup and dismantling of the banding station in the 2006 season. Also without the use of the banding equipment from Holland College's WCT program the project would not be possible. Thanks again.
Project OverviewIt well documented that bird populations have been in major decline across North America since the last half century. "A quarter of all bird species in the United States have declined in population since the 1970s, according to a report issued by the National Audubon Society". Declining bird populations are as a result of many factors with the major ones being deforestation of both breeding and wintering habitat and the depletion of food sources.
The program of Monitoring Avian Productivity and Survivorship (MAPS) was created in 1989 by The Institute for Bird Populations. The program was started in order to fill a void left by other avian monitoring projects (e.g. Breeding Bird Survey and Christmas Bird Counts) which only provide a census of populations at different times of the year unlike MAPS which provides data on demographic parameters and deals with the productivity and survivorship of landbirds in a local area. MAPS is a cooperative effort among bird banders who either belong to public or private organizations across Canada, Mexico and the continental United States to provide long-term data on populations of over a hundred targeted bird species at multiple spatial scales.
On Prince Edward Island our forests are very fragmented due mainly to our agricultural practices in this Province so the establishment of a MAPS station in Orwell area is a very worthwhile that collects valuable information on breeding birds in our geographic area. This is the fourth of the proposed five year study to look at avian productivity and survivorship within the Macphail Woods Ecological Forestry Project.
IntroductionThe 2006 field season for the Monitoring Avian Productivity and Survivorship (MAPS) at the Macphail Woods Ecological Forestry Project site started on May 31st this year which was the first day suggested for station operation within the Northeast region according to the MAPS procedures. This was the fourth consecutive year of conducting an inventory of breeding birds for this site in Orwell. This was done with the use of mist nets for capturing and banding birds as well as recording all bird species seen or heard by individuals that were not captured.
Before starting the 2006 banding season net lanes were cleared of any debris that may have accumulated since last summer so that the nets could be opened without getting tangled. Then the banding station tent was erected in a central location to the net locations. Lastly the banding equipment was checked over for any problems.
MethodologyTen standardized 10-12 meter mist nets were setup in the exact locations as the previous three years on the woodlot in order to capture and re-capture adults that had returned or were new to the study area and to catch the offspring that were born that summer. These locations were already predetermined in the first two years of operation for the most opportunistic placement for catching birds efficiently within the study area. The nets were operational for one day out of every ten day period from May 31st to August 17th. At the end of each sampling session mist nets were collapsed and tied to the poles in order to prevent accidental capture of birds. Birds captured were then processed by banding them, if not already banded, then by taking a series of measurements such as bill, tail and wing lengths. All banding data was then sent to the bird banding office in Ottawa, Ontario via a summary report after entering the data into a program called band manager.
Each day an avian species list was made of all the birds that were either seen or heard in the study area. These observations were helpful in determining whether a bird species was breeding in the study area even though it was not captured in the mist nets.
ResultsThe species list was very similar to the previous three years but with 15 more species recorded this year that were not listed last year namely, Bald Eagle, Barred Owl, Great Horned Owl, Common Raven, Golden-crowned Kinglet, Magnolia Warbler, Blackburnian Warbler, Cape May Warbler, Cedar Waxwing, Rose-breasted Grosbeak, Purple Finch, Evening Grosbeak, Chipping Sparrow, Mourning Dove, and Semipalmated Plover (Table 1). Only 61.5% or 16 of a possible 26 breeding songbird species within the study area were caught in the nets which could be attributed to adults avoiding nets early in the breeding season, birds being closer to the canopy and flying over the nets or not having the nets not close enough to a bird's territory. This figure helps to strengthen the need for a visual and auditory census during banding at a MAPS station.
Table 1: Breeding status of all birds seen or heard within the 2006 MAPS season. Breeder Bald Eagle Barred Owl * Ruby-throated Hummingbird Yellow-bellied Sapsucker Downy Woodpecker Hairy Woodpecker Northern Flicker * Eastern Wood Pewee * Least Flycatcher * Blue-headed Vireo * Red-eyed Vireo American Crow * Black-capped Chickadee Red-breasted Nuthatch * Brown Creeper Golden-crowned Kinglet * Swainson's Thrush * Hermit Thrush * American Robin Northern Parula Magnolia Warbler Yellow-rumped (Myrtle) Warbler * Black-throated Green Warbler * Blackburnian Warbler * Black-and-white Warbler * Ovenbird * Dark-eyed Junco Rose-breasted Grosbeak * Common Grackle Probable Breeder Mourning Dove Great Horned Owl Blue Jay Common Raven Chipping Sparrow Local Cedar Waxwing Purple Finch American Goldfinch Evening Grosbeak Migrant Semipalmated Plover Cape May Warbler * Species that were caught in mist nets.
During the ten banding sessions carried out there were 79 birds caught in the mist nets during the 2006 season which is down from last years high of 90 birds but still higher than the stations first two years of operation (Table 2). Of the birds captured there was an even split between those banded this year 39 and those recaptured from this years and previous years banding which was also 39. Of the 39 recaptures 26 were from previous years of banding. There was only one bird that was captured in the nets that was not banded and that was a Ruby-throated Hummingbird because a special permit is needed to band hummingbirds.
Once again the Ovenbird was the most captured species at the Macphail MAPS station with 17 individuals followed closely by Hermit Thrush with 11 birds caught. This could be explained in that both species prefer the understory of forests and build their nests on the ground. The only bird species that was banded this year that had not been banded in the study area before was a female Blackburnian Warbler. The male Blackburnian could be heard singing on the path leading to the banding station most mornings early in the breeding season. On an interesting note not one woodpecker was caught in the nets this year out of the four woodpecker species that frequent the study area. The other two species which failed to be caught this year that were caught in previous years were the Red-breasted Nuthatch and the Yellow-rumped Warbler.
Table 2: Totals of all species captured in mist nets over the four year study period. Family Species Total 2006 Total 2005 Total 2004 Total 2003 Banded 2006 Recaptured 2006 Not Banded 2006 Trochilidae Ruby-throated Hummingbird 1 2 5 4 0 0 1 Paridae Black-capped Chickadee 3 2 2 2 1 2 0 Sittidae Red-breasted Nuthatch 0 2 2 1 0 0 0 Cethiidae Brown Creeper 5 3 3 3 4 1 0 Turdidae Hermit Thrush 11 12 1 6 7 4 0 Turdidae Swainson's Thrush 8 7 2 3 3 5 0 Turdidae American Robin 6 8 1 8 2 4 0 Tyrannidae Eastern Wood Pewee 1 2 5 2 1 0 0 Vireonidae Red-eyed Vireo 4 3 12 5 0 4 0 Vireonidae Blue-headed Vireo 3 2 4 0 1 2 0 Parulidae Ovenbird 17 23 14 6 8 9 0 Parulidae Black-throated Green Warbler 9 7 7 9 4 5 0 Parulidae Blackburnian Warbler 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 Parulidae Yellow-rumped (Myrtle) Warbler 0 2 6 0 0 0 0 Picidae Yellow-bellied Sapsucker 0 2 3 0 0 0 0 Picidae Northern Flicker 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 Tyrannidae Least Flycatcher 6 3 0 1 4 2 0 Parulidae Black-and-white Warbler 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 Picidae Hairy Woodpecker 0 4 0 3 0 0 0 Picidae Downy Woodpecker 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 Emberizidae Northern Junco 2 3 1 1 1 1 0 Icteridae Common Grackle 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 Totals 79 90 69 54 39 39 1
This banding season was no different compared to those of previous seasons when it came to catching and banding hatch year birds. There were only five juveniles banded this year consisting of only two Hermit Thrushes on July 25th, an Ovenbird and Hermit Thrush on August 4th and another Hermit Thrush on August 17th. This raises reason for concern since part of the MAPS program relies on the bird species productivity. One answer to the lack of juveniles being caught is thought to be as a result of adults getting caught in the mist nets early in the breeding season and avoiding the location of the nets later on in the season when they are raising their young. Another reason for the low capture rates of juveniles may be due to the high canopy of the Macphail site. Many of the hardwood species tower well over the mist nets.
On a positive note however there was a great return of adults to the Macphail MAPS site with 26 recaptured birds that were banded in previous years (Table 3). Recaptures composed of 50% of the captured birds this year. All but one of the recaptured birds was banded at the Macphail site. A Blue-headed Vireo that was captured on June 22nd was banded by an American bander and there was no information available on the bird's age. With such a great return of adults to this breeding area the survivorship aspect of the MAPS program is good and there does not seem to be any reason for concern.
Table 3: Survivorship- recaptured birds at Macphail MAPS station in 2006. Band Number Species Date Recaptured Date First Banded Age at First Capture 1851-93198 Blue-headed Vireo June 14, 2006 07-05-05 AHY-U 1831-93113 Blue-headed Vireo June 22, 2006 NO INFO issued to an American bander 1831-31931 Red-eyed Vireo June 14, 2006 06-08-04 AHY-F 1851-93189 Red-eyed Vireo July 5, 2006 07-14-05 AHY-F 1831-31889 Black-capped Chickadee June 22, 2006 06-09-03 SY-M 2370-60870 Black-capped Chickadee September 6, 2006 06-24-05 AHY-F 2330-65903 Brown Creeper July 25, 2006 06-19-05 AHY-M 1961-81913 Swainson's Thrush June 14, 2006 06-06-05 SY-M 1961-81942 Swainson's Thrush June 22, 2006 NO INFO OUT TO 10542 1961-81943 Swainson's Thrush July 5, 2006 NO INFO OUT TO 10542 1961-81919 Hermit Thrush May 31, 2006 06-25-05 ASY-F 1961-81914 Hermit Thrush June 14, 2006 06-06-05 ASY-M 1861-34771 Hermit Thrush June 14, 2006 06-17-03 AHY-M 1961-81947 Hermit Thrush July 11, 2006 NO INFO OUT TO 10542 1152-42912 American Robin June 14, 2006 06-09-03 SY-M 1152-42966 American Robin July 5, 2006 NO INFO OUT TO 10542 2300-67506 Black-throated Green Warbler May 31, 2006 06-09-03 ASY-M 2300-65904 Black-throated Green Warbler May 31, 2006 08-16-04 HY-U 2300-65917 Black-throated Green Warbler June 22, 2006 08-16-04 HY-U 2300-65918 Black-throated Green Warbler June 22, 2006 08-16-04 HY-U 1831-31923 Ovenbird June 14, 2006 06-08-04 AHY-M 1831-32000 Ovenbird June 14, 2006 06-06-05 AHY-M 1851-93199 Ovenbird June 14, 2006 06-24-05 AHY-F 1851-93112 Ovenbird June 22, 2006 NO INFO OUT TO 10542 1851-93116 Ovenbird August 25, 2006 NO INFO OUT TO 10542 1831-31999 Ovenbird September 6, 2006 06-06-05 AHY-M
The age structure of the breeding bird population at the Macphail site was broken down into several categories from hatch year birds to after third year birds. With the capture of so many adults this year it was easy to determine that there are some birds that are over three years old and have been breeding at this site since the beginning of the MAPS station in 2003. For six birds in the unknown category it can be determined that those birds are of at least two years of age since they are birds that were banded in years previous to this season but the information has not been submitted yet. The only concern as mentioned earlier is the lack of captured juveniles. More study is needed to determine the true cause of this.
Table 4: Age breakdown for all four banding years. Study year Unknown HY AHY SY ASY TY ATY 2003 2 1 6 13 17 0 0 2004 2 2 8 10 25 1 0 2005 3 5 3 23 30 1 0 2006 7 5 23 3 8 1 6 HY=Hatch Year, AHY=After Hatch Year, SY=Second Year, ASY=After Second Year, TY=Third Year, ATY=After Third YearSummary and Recommendations
In summary the project was successful in obtaining another field seasons worth of breeding bird data for the Macphail MAPS study area. In my first year with this project I have gained invaluable information on the breeding birds in this area and even more confidence in banding and identifying songbirds. Under the MAPS protocol five consecutive years of data is needed to begin true analyses of the breeding bird status of a particular MAPS station. With this I would recommend and give my full support to keep this project running so it can obtain as many years worth of breeding bird data as possible for the MAPS project as a whole. The information collected in this study area will help give researches baseline data for breeding birds in a fragmented landscape like the Island.
The bottom line is that the Macphail banding station takes considerable effort to run and without the in-kind support from volunteers and the financial support of funding groups it would not be possible.
Return to Birds and Birding
We offer a number of workshops and guided tours at the Macphail Woods and it is an excellent opportunity to learn more about the Macphail Homestead, the Woods, and it's inhabitants. Check out the Events Calendar for more information. Web development and maintenance by Chris Martin.
